Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 is at the center of a heated debate as players express dissatisfaction over the perceived use of AI-generated art within the game. This controversy has sparked conversations across social media platforms, with many players suggesting that certain artistic elements, like the calling card images, bear a striking resemblance to Studio Ghibli’s iconic style.
Players Voice Concerns Over AI-Generated Art
Enthusiasts have taken to forums and social media to share their suspicions that AI tools were used to create game assets. A particular point of contention is the calling cards, which some claim mimic the artistic flair of Studio Ghibli. One user on Reddit raised the issue, questioning the authenticity of these elements. Meanwhile, on Twitter, another user speculated that AI might be influencing various aspects of the game’s art, including the Multiplayer and Zombie calling cards.
Activision Responds to the Backlash
In light of the uproar, Activision has released a statement acknowledging the use of digital tools, including AI, to enhance the development process. The company emphasized, “Our creative process continues to be led by the talented individuals in our studios.” The Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 Steam page also provides a disclaimer, indicating the use of generative AI tools to develop some in-game assets.
This isn’t a new issue for the franchise. Earlier this year, Activision faced similar backlash when it admitted to using AI in Black Ops 6, notably in a controversial zombie Santa loading screen. In August, Miles Leslie, associate creative director for Black Ops 7, clarified, “Everything you play: human-created and touched. AI tools… streamline it. That’s the goal. Not replace, but streamline.” Despite these reassurances, questions remain about Activision’s evolving stance.
Impressions of Black Ops 7
The latest installment, Call of Duty: Black Ops 7, is now available. While the campaign offers ambitious storytelling, feedback suggests it may not fully deliver on its lofty promises. Reviewers find it a bold yet inconsistent sequel, falling short of last year’s standards.