In early 2025, a YouTube video by a content creator named Hellfire claimed that Take-Two’s updated EULA for Borderlands titles was overly intrusive, accusing the publisher of “spying” on players. This led to a surge of negative Steam reviews across the Borderlands series, particularly following a second video in April that gained nearly 500,000 views.
Key Claims
The video raised concerns about Take-Two collecting personal data, such as names, usernames, phone numbers, IP addresses, and operating system details. It also criticized a clause restricting the use of mods or cheats, suggesting it could target modders and harm the community.
Analysis
The data collection concerns seem overstated, as the information listed in the EULA is typically provided when creating a Shift account for redeeming in-game codes. Most websites collect similar data for basic functionality. The modding clause focuses on preventing interference with other players’ experiences, such as cheating in online modes or accessing unpaid DLC, rather than banning harmless mods. No evidence suggests Take-Two or Gearbox is cracking down on modders.
Impact
The review bombing peaked around the video’s release but has since tapered off, as shown in Steam review graphs for titles like Borderlands 2. The controversy appears driven by misinformation amplified through forums and social media.
Additional Speculation
Rumors have also circulated about Take-Two potentially implementing kernel-level anticheat software in Borderlands 4 to collect sensitive data. No such software has been introduced, and there’s no indication of malicious intent. While kernel-level anticheat, used by other publishers like EA and Riot, raises valid security concerns, claims of personal data theft lack substantiation.
Conclusion
While vigilance about EULAs is important, the reaction to Take-Two’s terms seems driven by misinterpretation rather than genuine issues. The Borderlands review bombing highlights how quickly misinformation can spread in gaming communities.
Discover more news.