Following the recent Classic experimental event in Overwatch 2, discussions among professional players have intensified around the potential reintroduction of the 6v6 team structure. As the format gains momentum in both Quickplay and Ranked modes for the upcoming Season 15, many are beginning to question whether the professional scene should also embrace the change.
Debate surrounding the shift from 6v6 to 5v5 has existed since the sequel’s release, with reactions ranging from cautious optimism to clear dissatisfaction. Over time, as balancing issues—especially for solo tank players—have persisted, voices across the community have increasingly revisited the idea that the 6v6 setup may offer solutions to the game’s ongoing challenges.
Streamer Samito posted on X, stating that if the original Overwatch had used a 5v5 role lock, it likely wouldn’t have received Game of the Year recognition or developed such a lasting impact. He explained that 6v6 provided the right balance of memorable moments, distinct hero roles, and gameplay-driven skill expression that made the original title stand out. According to him, the 5v5 system prevents Overwatch 2 from reaching similar heights.
In a Director’s Take blog update, game director Aaron Keller highlighted the significance of the 6v6 limited-time mode, sharing that it represented nearly 10% of total community playtime during Season 14. Keller acknowledged the growing interest in the larger team size and revealed plans for a mini-competitive 6v6 season launching midway through Season 15. However, he also mentioned that it’s still too early to determine the long-term role of 6v6 in Overwatch 2, emphasizing that the core format is not yet being replaced.
Changing Perspectives in the Pro Community
Support for 6v6 has extended beyond casual players, with the competitive scene beginning to rally behind the format. This marks a notable shift from the initial reception of 5v5 when Overwatch 2 launched in 2023. At the time, many professional players defended the change.
Former pro player William ‘Crimzo’ Hernandez commented on X that early concerns about the move to 5v5 were largely resolved after extended scrims and two betas. He felt the decision had proven to be the right one during that phase of the game’s development.
However, with the reintroduction of 6v6 in recent weeks, pros from across the competitive spectrum have found themselves reenergized by the format. Xander ‘Hawk’ Domecq of Spacestation Gaming remarked that the 6v6 mode reminded him of the demanding nature that once defined Overwatch. He explained that the format requires far more mental engagement and noted how each role felt significantly more impactful.
The timing of this shift is particularly notable, as the Overwatch 2 esports ecosystem has been through considerable upheaval. With the Overwatch League officially concluded, uncertainty looms over the direction of competitive play. For some players, 6v6 might represent a chance to recapture the spirit of the game’s early days, while others fear it could further destabilize the scene if not implemented carefully.
Evaluating the Impact of a Full Transition
While the excitement around 6v6 continues to build, there remains hesitation regarding its immediate inclusion in the competitive structure. The potential switch is a significant undertaking and would likely not be finalized before the upcoming Esports World Cup.
Teams would be required to recruit an additional player, shifting rosters and compositions across the board. Strategies and synergy would need to be revisited from the ground up. The presence of two tanks per team, for instance, would lead to increased damage absorption and crowd control, requiring careful adjustment from both players and coaching staff.
As Season 15 progresses, the newly introduced competitive 6v6 mini-season will offer crucial insight into how the format functions at higher levels of play. This trial phase is expected to influence whether 6v6 becomes a long-term fixture in Overwatch 2 esports, signaling either a revival of the game’s original competitive charm or a challenging step backward.